How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

For example, Jesus has a God …

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

What can I say to a scammer who thinks he loves me, but I don't want to be scammed?

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

Why do people who aren't trans feel the need to put pronouns next to their name or picture? It seems so cringeworthy to me, to participate in that SJW paradigm of thought, like they are a spineless person who just goes along with the trends.

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

My cantankerous beagle is very badly behaved at the dog park and always starts barking at the other dogs. Would pepper spray be an effective method to correct his inappropriate behavior?

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Read also: